The ‘biggies’ in NASCAR’s evolution

This article is written assuming that most of my readers are interested in racing history, in particular the historical items dating back to what many of us would call “the good old days.” It’s also incomplete, depending on you to finish it.

When Big Bill France drew up the rules for his Strictly Stock Division, there were far fewer of them than there are today, but what rules there were created something far different from what takes to the track in Cup Series races these days.

(A note about the cover photo: Thanks to the wonders of brass, Big Bill and Ann France haven’t changed much over the years. The same can’t be said about the racing series Big Bill founded. The photo is from DaytonaBeach.com.)

What I’m going to do here is list my own choices of the biggest changes since 1949 and then give you an opportunity to add to (or criticize) my list. Here we go.


THE CARS – NASCAR has its own timeline here, and it goes like this:

Tim Flock’s Hudson represents the area of truly stock cars. (NASCAR photo)

1948-66 – Stock (actually, it should be ’49, the beginning of Strictly Stock/GN/Cup).

1967-80 – Purpose-built racing chassis (credited to Holman & Moody).

1981-91 – Wheelbase reduced to reflect downsizing of American Sedans.

1992-2006 – Highly modified bodies, developed through wind-tunnel testing.

2007-12 – Common body & chassis for all cars. (NASCAR also calls this a “new era of safety.”

So, here’s something that doesn’t look all that much like a Camry you could test drive at your Toyota dealer. (NASCAR photo)

2013-present (the NASCAR piece was published online in 2021 and has not been updated) – Common chassis but manufacturer-unique body panels. NASCAR has the nerve to say this “design puts the ‘stock’ back in stock car racing.” * (A note from the editor, below.)

2022-present (my update) – Gen 7 car. I guess NASCAR would say this continued the move toward more “stock” cars, but probably wouldn’t add that it was mostly intended to improve the quality of racing over its flawed predecessor.

That’s all very interesting, but I think I’d simplify it as follows:

1948-66 – Stock-ish. Modifications were introduced almost from the beginning, and this period includes several points where new changes were allowed, but it does pretty much cover when you could get a car out of a junkyard and convert it into a NASCAR Grand National racer.

1967-91 – Stock-looking purpose-built race cars. I’m not completely sold on this as an “era,” but I’ll allow for a break point where the cars officially stopped looking anything like stock cars, and ’91 is as good a marker as any. Other changes came on a year-to-year basis.

1991-2006 – NASCAR’s era of the “race” car versus the “stock” car. Still, the cars themselves came from the manufacturers and the major specialty builders/suppliers.

2007-present – The era of racing in “NASCAR” cars that have had varying amounts of input from the manufacturers (almost none in 2007, a fair amount today, but still nothing like 1967-2006). The sub-era of one supplier for most parts fits in this period, too.

NUMBER OF RACES – This one’s easy:

1949-71 – The era of “however many you can squeeze in.” Includes the years when Big Bill would schedule an East Coast race and a West Coast race the same day, and the years the next season’s schedule began in November of the previous year.

Say what you will about NASCAR’s current status, but you won’t find anything like this on the schedule. (Getty Images photo)

1972-present – The Winston Cup era and thereafter, with the smaller races whacked off the schedule and nearly all of what remained scheduled on Sunday or Saturday.

POINTS – This one’s kind of messy, but see if my timeline makes sense:

In the last couple of seasons of his GN/Cup career, Rex White (who just turned 95, I believe) drove a few races for Bud Moore, including this one in 1963. In 1964, he earned more points in six starts than Buddy Baker earned in 33 races, such was the absurdity of the point system then. (Photo from, FloridaStockCars.com, a website that no longer seems operational.)

1949-67 – Points based (using a variety of systems) on how much money a race paid. This system resulted in teams cherry-picking the richest races and still finishing well up in points: in 1965, Marvin Panch drove 20 races out of 52 total and finished fifth in points, with 400 more than sixth-place Bob Derrington, who ran 51 races.

1967-73 – Points based on the length of a race. Intended in part to deal with the above situation, and it worked from a points standpoint, but it didn’t stop top teams from only running the biggest races.

1974 – Anarchy (somebody from the current NASCAR management traveled back in time and designed this one). In an effort to get everybody to run all the events (remember, we’re now in the Winston Cup era, so the 200-lappers on half-mile tracks are gone, but the problem remained), points were awarded based on purse, but they then were multiplied by the number of races a driver had run (and then divided by 1,000, for no particular reason).

1975-2003 – The Bob Latford system, supposedly written out by its creator on a cocktail napkin. Designed to reward running all the races (and also rewarded consistency). Same number of points awarded for every race. Some bonus points eventually got thrown in.

2004-16 – The Latford system meets the Chase/Playoffs. Same point system, but it only serves to set up the Chase/Playoffs, which have a different system for the drivers making that final-10-races championship round. Over the last couple of years, the number of points awarded was reduced, but this didn’t change the theory behind the system.

2017-present – Stage Racing rears its ugly head, and larger numbers of points are awarded for performance other than at the finish. Also known as Anarchy II.

Within all of that is embedded the huge change that was the Chase/Playoffs, so, if you want, so you can divide this section into:

1949-2016 – One points system.

2017-present – One “regular season” points system and a second system for the Chase/Playoffs.

RULES – I’ve noted before that my mid-‘60s NASCAR rule book (pocket-sized) has only eight pages of rules specifically applied to GN/Cup. At some point, maybe around that 1991 time when “stock cars converted for racing” became “race cars that look a little like stock cars,” there was a fundamental change in rules and their interpretation. The old way was, “It’s legal unless we say it’s illegal.” The new way became, “It’s illegal unless we say it’s legal.” That required more rules. And more rules. And more rules.

ELIMINATION OF DIRT TRACKS – The North Carolina State Fairgrounds track in Raleigh ran the last dirt track race in 1970. You can categorize the recent three-year fling at Bristol as you wish. As someone who watches racing almost exclusively on dirt these days, I regret this, although I realize that what the Cup car has become is in no way a dirt track race car.

MULTI-CAR TEAMS – When the first Strictly Stock race was run at Charlotte on June 19, 1949, there were four two-car teams in the field, and the R.B. McIntosh entries included winner Jim Roper (after Glenn Dunaway’s disqualification), but three-quarters of the field was single-car teams. Twenty-five years later, at Atlanta in 1964, there were seven two-car teams and one three-car operation, but more than half the entries were single-car. Fast forward another 25 years to Pocono in June 1999 and there are six 2-car teams, two three-car teams, a four-car team (Jack Roush), and 20 1-car teams, still nearly half the field. This past June at Loudon, there were three four-car teams, two three-car teams, eight two-car teams, and two single-car teams. That’s a single-car team drop from 20-25 in 1949, ’64, and ’99 to two today.

Carl Kiekhaefer was ahead of his time in 1955-56 with his multi-car Chrysler team, which all total collected 52 wins in 90 races. Today, he’d just be one of the boys. (Photo from NASCAR Hall of Fame but originally Getty Images.)

CHARTERS (AND PROVISIONALS) – This, of course, is closely tied to the multi-car teams above. It all started when Richard Petty couldn’t reliably qualify for races in 1989, and TV ratings dropped when he wasn’t in the field. The “Past Champion’s Provisional” starting position was added. Later more provisionals joined it, ostensibly so prominent sponsors wouldn’t be shut out of TV exposure and quit the sport. Then the world turned upside-down in 2016 when teams were awarded “charters,” NASCAR’s equivalent of a franchise. ALL chartered cars were guaranteed a starting spot in every race, regardless of how pathetic they ran, although NASCAR reserved the right to pull a charter if “pathetic” reached a certain point. The owners now want the right to be as pathetic as they please and still keep their charters (or sell them at a handsome profit). A 40-car starting field now has four positions that are earned by outqualifying somebody (if there are enough people out there willing to fight city hall and race without a charter).

Let’s break down this last one into eras:

1949-90 – You get into a race if you’re fast enough.

1991-2015 – You get in if you’re fast enough or important enough.

2016-present – There are a couple of cheap seats available in the back for those who can’t show their membership card.

To Summarize – Here are my NASCAR changes:

Here’s NASCAR the old.
Here’s NASCAR the not-quite-so-old. Until my mother gave up her house 10 years ago, this decal adorned the door of what had been my bedroom.
Here’s NASCAR today.

CARS – From stock cars to race cars.

RACES – From as many as possible to one per weekend for about three-quarters of the year.

POINTS – From a purse-based system to a two-part, every-race-is-equal system.

TRACKS – From dirt and pavement to only pavement (more-or-less).

TEAMS – From predominantly single-car to almost exclusively multi-car.

ACCESS – From “Here’s what it costs to enter a race,” to “May I see your membership card?”

What have I missed, other than the number of people working for NASCAR with vice president in their titles? I’ll follow up after we’ve had some input.

Frank’s Loose Lug Nuts – I’m writing this on the day after a visit to one of my favorite tracks, the quarter-mile dirt Path Valley Speedway, at the base of a mountain outside Spring Run, Pa. The PA Sprint Series IMCA/RaceSaver (economy) sprint cars were there, along with limited late models, two classes of micro-sprints, and 4-cylinder thunder cars.

In some ways, I think the thunders put on the best show, with nice multi-car battles up front and a kind of surprise winner, after some others took each other out of contention. There was even a disqualification.

Some of the cars looked really nice, others, less so. The entire 24-car field probably cost less than a single Cup car, but they were entertaining, even more so to the regular fans who had favorites and villains in the field.

Path Valley 4-cylinder Thundercar winner Aaron Updegraff in #77. (Photos from Aaron Updegraff’s Facebook page and Path Valley Speedway Facebook page)

Even had the weather cooperated in Michigan, I think this would have been the better race.

Frank Buhrman

* Editor’s note: Not exactly what your daily driver looks like underneath. Picture from Coery Lajoie’s flip at MIS this weekend!!

Photo from GM Authority

13 comments

  1. I wonder which of the hundreds of members of each of today’s multi-car charter teams is the VP in Charge of Scouring Junkyards for Usable Parts?

  2. Frank, excellent writing on this one and I agree with most everything you said. What I will add, and you probably said it but my vision is bad and I would have missed it.
    First up, Stage Racing is a total travesty. Whoever thought that up should be burned at the stake in the Darlington infield. That is not racing, that is manipulation.
    Next, having a regular season champion and an end of the season champion takes an idiot to conceive.
    The overtime rule is another error in the judgment of fools. The race a few weeks ago had five overtimes. Stupid.
    The way NASCAR chooses to throw a caution if questionalbe at best. All those cautions with two laps to go seems to benefit a Toyota, but, of course Toyota owns NASCAR now.
    Rules? Are you kidding me? NASCAR makes them up as they go along, no consistenty whatsoever.
    In my opinion, two of the main issues with today’s NASCAR are Elton Sawyer and Steve Phelps. They should not be allowed to oversee a kindergarten playground.
    There are several other issues but I may have gone to far already. What NASCAR calls a race car these days is a manufactured joke, All the cars are the same with juist the nose clip and tail clip different.
    I started going to races in 1952 and I have always supported the sport. Last year I began to question how I could be loyal to such a joke. This year I’m not even watching. NASCAR, you have driven away more fans than you have brought in.
    This is my opinion and it is very unlikely it will change as long as NASCAR continues this joke they call racing .

    1. It’s bigger than NASCAR. I recently went to my first extra inning baseball game where a runner was put on second base (without batting) to increase the likelihood of a score. Not my cuppa tea, but as with NASCAR, I’m not the target. Everybody wants the younger fans, who’ll spend more money to pay all those VP salaries. It’s all about money, and while they’ll gladly take mine, I’m not the target. I’ve responded to that pretty much the same as you have.

    2. Frank, Great writing and a very good article.
      The comments of others are right on and the response you are getting really makes me stop and think – and remember.
      Things have changed way too much and NASCAR is not, nor never will be again, the sport we have all known and enjoyed for so many years.
      Thank You!

  3. Tim, I have this nagging feeling that things are going to change in a big way soon. And I’m not talking about the head butting between NASCAR & the RTA. Over the last 3 years, NASCAR has done a lot of “realigning” financially. Couple that with the fact that they have hired a large banking operation, that specializing in selling entities to places like investment groups. Jim France can’t live forever. I don’t think that Lisa France Kennedy is going to be at the head of the table. Both of them will never have to worry about anything, financially speaking. That brings us to Ben Kennedy. The best thing that I can think of for him, is that he came up with a way to race during COVID. Pretty much everything else he’s done sucks.

    It was bad enough that we’ve had to see the Clash in LA, instead of Daytona. Now it’s going to be at Bowman-Gray? I’m an old modified racer, and I don’t even watch the races from there. To me, wrecking ain’t racing. It was his bright idea to have 7 road course races in a season. Even though this car is basically an Australian Super Car, our current crop of Cup racers haven’t figured out how to actually pass someone on a road course, without crashing half the field. I thought that the lightbulb would go on for them, after SVG schooled them in his first race, but no. They had over a 100k of people show up for a road course race at Road America. So their reward for giving NASCAR the largest crowd to see a Cup race in years, had their race date given to Chicago. They might have gotten more eyes on those races in Chicago, but most weren’t actually paying customers. How smart was that? Thankfully nobody was killed in a drive by.

    From the early 70s to the late 90s, my Sundays were controlled by trying to see a Cup race on TV. As I was in the military for nearly all of that time, it was job commitment first, then racing. I can tell you that didn’t always sit well with my wife or son. But I wasn’t done torturing her, because I started my own modified team in 1996. Somehow, we’ve made it to 47 years of marriage.

    I think that either the RTA or SMI, with outside partners, or maybe as partners, is going to be running the show. Bruton Smith always wanted to beat out the France family, but ended up just coexisting with them. Maybe his son will get it done. SMI owns enough tracks, and has shown they aren’t afraid to lease a track to host one of their dates either, as is the case with COTA. So I don’t think that would be a problem to find other tracks that they don’t own, to host a race.

    The RTA has a lot of money behind them, and that’s not just the billionaire team owners. Even though the owners all say that they are losing money every year, they’re still here. As I have owned a couple of successful businesses after my military career, I never had the luxury of losing money every year. The last time I checked, that’s called bankruptcy, but none of them have filed. When Kaufman bought controlling interest in Petty Enterprise, I never thought that’s what he was really after. He helped start the RTA, then sold the Petty team, at a very good profit. He has an investment group, and it seems that he has an itch to own the whole pie, not just a small slice.

    A year ago I said on this site, that I thought this thing with the charters was just about getting a better percentage from the TV rights package, that was about to happen for the 2025 season. And yes, they want a bigger cut, but I’m not sure anymore who “they” is. I think that the smaller teams would be tickled to death for that. I’m not thinking that the Hendrick, Jordan, Penske, Trackhouse, Gibbs RFK people are thinking that anymore. If SMI can persuade enough current Cup teams to split (at least 60%), they could make it work. But only Penske knows first hand what happened, when CART and the George family did that to Indy car racing. It still hasn’t recovered their status in the racing world. NASCAR could try and soldier on, but its value to teams, sponsors, and the TV networks will be gone. And the TV networks will be all kinds of pissed after just signing those contracts. That can’t be good for the teams or the sponsors. The networks might then try the legal system to try and break those contracts. That would probably force NASCAR to close the doors.

    No, I think that NASCAR would sell the whole thing, if they thought that was a possible outcome. At least that way, they’re all still filthy stinking rich, and can find something else to spend their money on. I hope that I’m wrong on all of this. But something has got to change.

  4. So enjoyed this one Frank. You triggered so many thoughts and emotions I’m not sure where to start… so I’ll wait till I get more organized in my thoughts. The comments you triggered with this hit some real nerves with others as well. Great indicator you’ve got a real winner here. Just wished there was some way this could be required reading for all fans.

    Thanks again.

  5. By the way Frank, why hasn’t some marketing genius found a way to logo up the underwing? Nice and gig and flat and if you ever have lift off it’ll be seen forever.

    Creative placement did wonders for Ricky Bobby.

    It’s only a matter of time.

    1. Even bigger space if you use the entire underside of the car. Maybe an insurance company, body shop, or wrecker service would take advantage of that opportunity.

  6. Frank, Great writing and a very good article.
    The comments of others are right on and the response you are getting really makes me stop and think – and remember.
    Things have changed way too much and NASCAR is not, nor never will be again, the sport we have all known and enjoyed for so many years.
    Thank You!

  7. Just wondering:
    Does anyone remember Robin Miller and what he said?
    “Toyota will ruin NASCAR in a few years.”
    He was so right

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.